Simulation Use in Respiratory Therapy Programs in Saudi Arabia: Results of a National Survey.

Background: The use of simulation-based methods for teaching and learning in the education of health professions is increasing, but its prevalence in Saudi Arabia among respiratory therapy programs has yet to be investigated. The purpose of this study is to identify the use of simulation-based learning (SBL) in respiratory therapy programs in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed by sending Google forms survey via Email to directors of respiratory therapy programs in Saudi Arabia (N=16) to evaluate how each one used simulations as an educational tool. Results: The survey was returned with a total response of 12 out of all 16 program that were initially contacted (75% response rate). Among the respondents, approximately 75% of the programs are using SBL, while high-fidelity simulation is used by all programs. The present data show that 67% of the respiratory therapy programs has a space for simulation within the department, while 33% utilizes institutional simulation centers. For short simulation scenarios, debriefing is not conducted in 67% of the programs. There is acceptance by program directors that simulation hours should be counted towards clinical hours. About 67% of respondent programs have mandatory simulation learning activities, and 100% agree that simulations should be used more. However, lack of training and shortage of staff are among barriers to increase the use of SBL. Conclusion: SBL is commonly used and relatively varied among respiratory therapy programs. However, it requires some improvements in several aspects, including the use of debriefing and increasing the number of properly trained staff.

Exploring the Content Validity of the Unified Wilson Disease Rating Scale: Insights from Qualitative Research.

INTRODUCTION: Wilson disease (WD) is a rare metabolic disorder of impaired copper transport manifesting in hepatic, neurological, and psychiatric symptoms. To evaluate the clinical symptoms of WD in clinical trials, a group of clinicians created the Unified Wilson Disease Rating Scale (UWDRS). Content validity of this scale has not been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the content validity of the UWDRS Part II from the patient perspective. METHODS: This study utilized multiple qualitative research methods including concept elicitation interviews, concept/instrument mapping, and cognitive debriefing interviews. RESULTS: Concept elicitation interviews with a sample of patients with WD and one or more neurological signs/symptoms identified several signs, symptoms, and impacts related to neurological dysfunction, strengthening our understanding of the importance of the neurological aspects of the WD patient experience. Mapping neurological concepts to Part II and III items of the UWDRS showed complete coverage of all salient neurological concepts and near complete coverage of all neurological concepts reported by patients in concept elicitation interviews. Item debriefing of Part II of the UWDRS revealed that patients generally found the items clear and personally relevant to their experience with WD. CONCLUSION: Overall, the findings from this study provide evidence for the content validity of the UWDRS Part II and supportive evidence for the content validity of Part III. The UWDRS should be used in conjunction with additional clinical outcomes assessments, specifically those evaluating the hepatic and psychiatric signs/symptoms of WD, to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the WD patient experience.

Structured feedback and operative video debriefing with critical view of safety annotation in training of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The learning curve in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is lengthened compared to open surgery. It has been reported that structured feedback and training in teams of two trainees improves MIS training and MIS performance. Annotation of surgical images and videos may prove beneficial for surgical training. This study investigated whether structured feedback and video debriefing, including annotation of critical view of safety (CVS), have beneficial learning effects in a predefined, multi-modal MIS training curriculum in teams of two trainees. METHODS: This randomized-controlled single-center study included medical students without MIS experience (n = 80). The participants first completed a standardized and structured multi-modal MIS training curriculum. They were then randomly divided into two groups (n = 40 each), and four laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LCs) were performed on ex-vivo porcine livers each. Students in the intervention group received structured feedback after each LC, consisting of LC performance evaluations through tutor-trainee joint video debriefing and CVS video annotation. Performance was evaluated using global and LC-specific Objective Structured Assessments of Technical Skills (OSATS) and Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) scores. RESULTS: The participants in the intervention group had higher global and LC-specific OSATS as well as global and LC-specific GOALS scores than the participants in the control group (25.5 ± 7.3 vs. 23.4 ± 5.1, p = 0.003; 47.6 ± 12.9 vs. 36 ± 12.8, p < 0.001; 17.5 ± 4.4 vs. 16 ± 3.8, p < 0.001; 6.6 ± 2.3 vs. 5.9 ± 2.1, p = 0.005). The intervention group achieved CVS more often than the control group (1. LC: 20 vs. 10 participants, p = 0.037, 2. LC: 24 vs. 8, p = 0.001, 3. LC: 31 vs. 8, p < 0.001, 4. LC: 31 vs. 10, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Structured feedback and video debriefing with CVS annotation improves CVS achievement and ex-vivo porcine LC training performance based on OSATS and GOALS scores.

Perceptions of medical students on narrow learning objectives and structured debriefing in medical escape rooms: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Escape rooms are increasingly used in medical education as a complementary learning technique or even alternative to traditional educational approaches. Few studies focus on debriefing following medical escape rooms and how escape rooms can be used to achieve pre-defined learning objectives. Evaluating the use of narrow learning objectives may increase the depth of reflections and transform an engaging team event into an effective learning opportunity. This study aimed to explore participants' experiences and perceived learning outcomes of narrow learning objectives in a medical escape room with debriefing. METHODS: In this explorative, qualitative study, participants saw a video lecture, participated in an escape room experience, and in a following debriefing. Throughout this learning session, the learning objectives concerned "exchange of information" and are therefore relatively narrow. Participants then participated in a semi-structured focus group interview and completed a demographic questionnaire. Participants were volunteer final-year medical students. Focus group interview recordings were transcribed and analysed using systematic text condensation. RESULTS: Thirty-two students in eight groups completed the study. Five themes were described in the analysis of the focus group interviews: Experience with the narrow learning objectives, topics discussed in the debriefing, learning mechanisms, learning outcomes concerning exchange of information and influences of the learning approach. CONCLUSIONS: Narrow learning objectives and structured debriefing seem to increase perceived learning depth of medical escape room sessions. Using semi-structured debriefing still allows for discussions of other elements relevant to the students. CLINICAL TRIALS: Clinical.trials ID NCT04783259.

A Staged Defragmented Simultaneous Debriefing Model As Integrated Micro-debriefing Components Inside Online Simulation for Competencies Formation.

Background Currently, there are no separate debriefing models for online simulation training, and existing models simply imitate the traditional models used in on-site simulation training (the physical presence of individuals, such as students or trainees, in a simulation center). This involves hands-on, in-person training within a simulated environment to enhance practical skills and knowledge in a controlled setting. This scenario does not fully meet the requirements and capabilities of distance learning. Objective To develop a staged defragmented debriefing model as integrated micro-debriefing components inside an online simulation to support the development of clinical decision-making and competencies formation within medical education and offer recommendations to support the use of this debriefing model as a teaching strategy. Methods This descriptive study was conducted from August 2020 to September 2023. To build a staged defragmented debriefing model as integrated micro-debriefing components inside an online simulation for competencies formation the traditional debriefing model's components for on-site simulation training, simulation type, and structure, modern concepts of e-learning, and classification of the seriousness of medication errors were used. The main focus of this study was on providing a detailed account of the debriefing components for online simulation training, features, and implementation of this new teaching model. A total of 38 participants, healthcare professionals, were recruited for this study. The participants were randomly assigned to two groups: one experiencing the staged defragmented debriefing model (n = 20) and the other control group, which received traditional debriefing following simulation training (n = 18). Results The results allowed us to successfully develop a staged defragmented debriefing model inside the simulation that integrates micro-debriefing components located at different points of the simulation scenarios. This teaching approach was successfully implemented in online clinical case scenarios in the "ClinCaseQuest" Simulation Training Platform for continuous medical education. Additionally, an internal validation experiment comparing the effectiveness of the staged defragmented debriefing model with the traditional debriefing method demonstrated superior learning outcomes and participant satisfaction in the staged debriefing group. Conclusions The staged defragmented debriefing model, when integrated into online simulations, represents a promising strategy for advancing clinical decision-making skills and competencies formation in medical education. Implementation of this debriefing model as a teaching strategy holds promise for enhancing learning outcomes in medical education settings. Further research, validation, and implementation are recommended to maximize the model's potential impact on medical education and training.

Use of different debriefing methods after in situ simulation with intensive care unit nurses.

BACKGROUND: The debriefing phase is the simulation phase where performance improves and learning occurs. This study examined the effects of the learning conversation (LC)-based, 3D (defusing, discovering and deepening) model-based and unstructured debriefing methods on satisfaction and debriefing experience after in-situ simulation among intensive care unit (ICU) nurses. METHODS: In this randomized controlled experimental study, three debriefing methods were compared, according to which 119 ICU nurses were divided into the following groups: LC group (n = 38), 3D group (n = 40) and control group (n = 41). In- situ simulation was performed with an intensive care patient scenario. p < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The total Debriefing Experience Scale-Experience with Debriefing part scores were 89.76 ± 8.10 in the LC group, 88.90 ± 8.70 in the 3D group and 88.29 ± 7.28 in the control group. No significant difference was found in debriefing experience and satisfaction between the groups (p > .05), but a significant difference was observed in the LC group. The groups showed a homogeneous distribution regarding participant characteristics. CONCLUSION: Debriefing experience and satisfaction do not differ between the methods. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Implementation of the simulation in the ICU in - situ with ICU nurses is beneficial in obtaining a fidelity experience. Performing the debriefing application after simulation in line with the model supports the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL) debriefing standards.

Development of a Midwifery Student Peer Debriefing Tool: An interpretive descriptive study.

BACKGROUND: Psychosocial traumatisation associated with giving birth, can occur in those present with the woman giving birth, a phenomenon known as vicarious trauma. It has been identified that there are currently no interventions available for midwifery students who have experienced vicarious trauma following difficult birth experiences. OBJECTIVE: To explore whether the counselling intervention developed by Gamble et al. (2005), can be adapted for midwifery students to be appropriately and feasibly used as a counselling intervention with peers who have experienced midwifery practice-related vicarious trauma. DESIGN: Interpretive descriptive methodology. SETTING: This study was set at two Australian universities from which pre-registration midwifery courses are delivered. PARTICIPANTS: The work of reviewing the original tool and adapting it for use by and with midwifery students associated with this project was conducted by a key stakeholder group of seven representative midwifery students and five midwifery academics. METHODS: Ethics were approved. Data were collected via one face to face and two online conversations using the Microsoft Teams™ platform. Reflexive Thematic analysis were applied to revise the tool following each round of data collection and to finalise the adaptation of the intervention for its new intended purpose. RESULTS: The Midwifery Student Peer Debriefing Tool is presented as a six-step intervention that guides the midwifery student through a process of debriefing with their peer. The feasibility of the tool resulted in an overarching theme labelled "I want this to mean something" and captures the therapeutic power of peer debriefing toward a meaningful outcome that fostered growth, and a deeper understanding of the profession. CONCLUSION: Vicarious trauma is widely recognised as a core reason for midwives and midwifery students leaving the workforce. The peer debriefing tool helps midwifery students move through the process of recovering from adversity but also fostered learnings about midwifery practice and the profession.

Fluctuating cohesion: A grounded theory study of nursing students engaged in a combined debriefing format.

AIM: This study explored the social processes enacted by nursing students when they engage in a combined format of structured peer debriefing followed by instructor-led debriefing after in-person simulation. The aim was to gain insight into nursing students' perceptions and how peer processes influenced reflection and learning. BACKGROUND: Debriefing, a key component of clinical simulation, promotes development of nursing students' reflective processes and enhances learning. In-person group-debriefing led by faculty/instructors is the most used debriefing format in healthcare simulation education. Yet, recent studies indicate instructor-led formats may increase students' anxiety and limit their capacity for reflection, a crucial step in clinical reasoning and decision making. Investigations into learner-centered formats support peer debriefing as a reasonable alternative to traditional instructor-led debriefing. However, current peer debriefing studies provide little insight into the social interactions and processes supporting reflection and learning; and little theoretical basis exists for the integration of alternatives to instructor-led debriefing formats (such as peer debriefing) into simulation-based education. DESIGN: This qualitative study used a Straussian grounded theory design. METHODS: Senior-level baccalaureate and associate degree nursing students from an U.S. public university with first-hand experience using the combined format of peer debriefing followed by instructor-led debriefing were recruited to participate in focus-group interviews. Data gathered from semi structured interviews were analysed using the iterative process of constant comparison. Theory building was aided using memoing, theoretical sampling and conceptual diagramming. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 34 students. Study findings revealed the core category of the constructed theory, 'Fluctuating cohesion', involved students' pervasive sense of going back and forth between a sense of unity (we-ness) and separatism (me-ness) while engaged in the combined debriefing format. The theory integrated five related categories: discovering the process, normalizing experiences, developing mutuality, dynamic balancing and engaging informal social connections. Findings illustrated the processes students enacted to take ownership for learning and proactively discuss their clinical decision-making with the instructor. In turn, reflection was enhanced by increased receptiveness to subsequent expert feedback. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings demonstrated that augmenting instructor-led debriefing with peer debriefing leveraged the beneficial nature of peer interactions, promoted psychological safety, facilitated nascent team behaviors and enhanced reflective thinking. The resultant theory that was generated from the findings and grounded in participants' experience, provides a meaningful framework that may inform future learner-centered debriefing formats aimed at optimizing debriefing effectiveness.

An International Collaborative Initiative to Establish a Quality-of-Life Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents with Repair of Esophageal Atresia in 14 Countries.

The EA-QOL questionnaire measures quality-of-life specifically for children born with esophageal atresia (EA) aged 8-18 and was completed in Sweden and Germany. This study aimed to describe an international collaborative initiative to establish a semantically equivalent linguistic version of the EA-QOL questionnaires in 12 new countries. The 24-item EA-QOL questionnaire was translated into the target languages and the translated questionnaire was evaluated through cognitive debriefing interviews with children with EA aged 8-18 and their parents in each new country. Participants rated an item as to whether an item was easy to understand and sensitive/uncomfortable to answer. They could choose not to reply to a non-applicable/problematic item and provide open comments. Data were analyzed using predefined psychometric criteria; item clarity ≥80%, item sensitive/uncomfortable to answer ≤20%, item feasibility(missing item responses ≤5%). Decision to improve any translation was made by native experts-patient stakeholders and the instrument developer. Like in Sweden and Germany, all items in the cross-cultural analysis of child self-report (ntot = 82, 4-10 children/country) met the criteria for item clarity in all 12 new countries, and in parent-report (ntot = 86, 5-10 parents/country) in 8/12 countries. All items fulfilled the criteria for sensitive/uncomfortable to answer (child-report 1.2-9.9%; parent-report 0-11.6%) and item feasibility. Poor translations were resolved. Hence, this study has established semantically equivalent linguistic versions of the EA-QOL questionnaire for use in children aged 8-18 with repair of EA in and across 14 countries.

Factors and Processes Facilitating Recovery from Coercion in Mental Health Services-A Meta-Ethnography.

BACKGROUND: Being subjected to or witnessing coercive measures in mental health services can have a negative impact on service users, carers and professionals, as they most often are experienced as dehumanising and traumatic. Coercion should be avoided, but when it does happen, it is important to understand how the experience can be processed so that its consequences are managed. METHOD: A systematic review and meta-ethnography was used to synthesise findings from qualitative studies that examined service users', staff's and relatives' experiences of recovery from being exposed to coercive measures in mental health care settings. We identified, extracted and synthesised, across 23 studies, the processes and factors that were interpreted as significant to process the experience. RESULTS: Recovery from coercion is dependent on a complex set of conditions that support a sense of dignity and respect, a feeling of safety and empowerment. Being in a facilitating environment, receiving appropriate information and having consistent reciprocal communication with staff are the means through which these conditions can be achieved. People employ strategies to achieve recovery, both during and after coercion, to minimise its impact and process the experience. CONCLUSIONS: The findings point to the importance of mental health care settings offering recovery-oriented environments and mental health professionals employing recovery-oriented practices, that would empower service users to develop strategies for managing their mental distress as well as their experiences in mental health care in a way that minimises traumatisation and fosters recovery.

Proactive debriefing to promote wellbeing in intensive care nurses: A protocol.

BACKGROUND: The dynamic, rewarding, yet challenging environment of the intensive care unit is experienced in extremes by intensive care nurses. To ensure intensive care nurses can continue to fulfil their professional roles and responsibilities, careful consideration and promotion of collective and individual wellbeing is required. Regular proactive debriefing provides an opportunity to commune, connect, and reflect on the challenging nature of clinical work and is a potential intervention to aid in the promotion of wellbeing. AIM/OBJECTIVE: This study aims to collaboratively develop, implement, and evaluate a proactive debriefing intervention, which will target the promotion of nurses' wellbeing. STUDY PLAN: This hybrid effectiveness-implementation study will use a pretest/post-test design to test a codesigned proactive debriefing intervention on the wellbeing of nurses working in a large quaternary intensive care unit. This research will be conducted in two phases. Phase one will consist of focus groups and a codesign workshop. Phase two surrounds the implementation and analysis of the codesigned intervention.

Translation and Psychometric Testing of the Hägerbäumer Presenteeism Scale in English.

PURPOSE: Interest in presenteeism has increased in research. Presenteeism is a behaviour of going to work despite illness. It has been predominantly measured using single items, which introduce limitations to validity. To overcome these limitations, Hägerbäumer developed a German multi-item presenteeism scale. METHODS: The aim of the study was to provide an English translation and psychometric testing of the scale. This was conducted in two phases with native English-speaking employed adults. Phase 1 includes translation and cognitive debriefing, phase 2 testing construct validity and internal consistency reliability. RESULTS: Cognitive debriefing with 10 employees revealed no problems with understanding or answering the translated items. In total, 487 employed adults participated in the study, of which data from 287 were included in the analysis. For structural validity, the goodness-of-fit indicators all reached their thresholds (TLI = 0.98, CFI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.07, SRMR = 0.02). The scale does not show differences between sexes and age groups but between sectors (F6,70.95 = 5.53, p < 0.001). The internal consistency reliability was satisfactory with α = 0.89 (CI 95%, 0.87-0.91). CONCLUSION: The translated multidimensional scale for measuring presenteeism at the behavioural level demonstrated good psychometric properties in an initial validation. Further psychometric testing is required before using this scale in cross-national comparison in research and international companies.

Using simulation to improve pharmacy operators' handling of cytotoxic spills.

INTRODUCTION: International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners guidelines recommend having standard operating procedures (SOPs) and initial and yearly retraining programs on cytotoxic spill handling for pharmacy operators (POs). This study aimed to create a simulation-based training (SBT) program on this subject and evaluate its impact on POs' real-life performance. METHODS: Randomly formed pairs of POs underwent a 2.5-hour training program, including two simulation exercises (a broken cytotoxic vial on the floor and a leaking cytotoxic bag) in a simulated pharmacy production unit. Each participant applied the cytotoxic spill handling SOPs. The PO and trainer-pharmacist did a debriefing after each exercise. Satisfaction was recorded on a 0-to-100% scale. A 20-item questionnaire assessed general knowledge about cytotoxic spill handling before and after the training. One month before and one month after the training, the POs underwent a real-life test when the trainer broke a fake cytotoxic vial in the cytotoxic storage area. Their performance in applying the SOPs was assessed on a 20-point checklist, and the time to handle the spill was recorded. RESULTS: Twelve POs participated. Mean satisfaction score was 98.9%. Mean knowledge score improved from 10.8/20 (SD = 2.0) before training to 14.5/20 (SD = 1.6) after training (p < 0.05). Mean real-life SOP performance improved from 78.6% (SD = 7.4%) to 97.1% (SD = 5.2%) (p < 0.05). Mean time to handle cytotoxic spills decreased from 17.3 minutes (SD = 3.6 minutes) to 11.9 minutes (SD = 1.5 minutes) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: POs improved their knowledge and real-life competencies for handling cytotoxic spills. This training will be included in POs' initial and continuing training programs.

"I need to make sense of my birth experience": A descriptive qualitative study of postnatal women's opinions, and expectations about postnatal debriefing.

BACKGROUND: Evidence shows that women feel valued and satisfied after discussing their birth experiences. However, uncertainties persist surrounding the concept of postnatal debriefing practice. AIM: To explore the opinions and expectations of women relating to postnatal debriefing and their experiences when the postnatal debriefing is not presented. METHOD: A descriptive qualitative study of 20 postnatal women was conducted using in-depth semi-structured interviews from April-May 2023. Thematic analysis was applied to the data collected in interviews. RESULTS: Analysis of interview data generated three main themes and nine sub-themes. Women wanted to make sense of their birth experience They expressed their opinions on the components of postnatal debriefing They advocated for all women to be offered this practice by known healthcare professionals who interact with them They do not want to only talk about their birth experience but also meet their needs Women agree that expectations related to birth determine the need for the practice. They hoped for psychological adaptation by relieving their distress and gaining a sense of closure. The discussion process was expected to prevent reflection of trauma to the future and provide transition to the postnatal period. CONCLUSION: The present study explored women perceptions and expectations of postnatal debriefing. Healthcare professionals should behave sensitively to women's expectations and needs in relation to their birth experience. Further research is warranted to clarify the components and effects of postnatal debriefing practice to develop consolidated guidance.

Translation of the Preference-Based Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Scale into French.

The objective of this study was to translate the Preference-Based Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Scale to French-Canadian. After the scale underwent forward and back translations, the expert committee examined the translated versions and found minor grammatical errors and suggested idioms to be changed to better represent French-Canadian language. Cognitive debriefing interviews were carried out to assess the pre-final version for clarity, and minor changes were made. Consensus from the expert committee and people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis on the measure's clarity, word choice, and meaning were achieved, resulting in the final French version of the Preference-Based Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Scale.

Impacto de retroalimentación integral (debriefing) frente al modelo de enseñanza tradicional en la mejora de la calidad en estudios de ultrasonido obstétrico / Impact of comprehensive feedback (debriefing) vs traditional teaching model on quality improvement in obstetric ultrasound studies

Introducción: El debriefing es una técnica que permite mejorar los resultados en el proceso de aprendizaje a través de un proceso de reflexión y retroalimentación. El objetivo del estudio es comparar la efectividad del debriefing frente al modelo tradicional de enseñanza para mejorar el cumplimiento de calidad en ultrasonido obstétrico. Sujetos y métodos: Se evaluaron los resultados del control de calidad de 45 médicos recién egresados de diplomados de ultrasonido durante tres meses. Los médicos fueron divididos en dos grupos para llevar a cabo la retroalimentación de áreas de oportunidad: el grupo de control sólo recibió educación a través del modelo tradicional y el grupo de intervención recibió retroalimentación con metodología de debriefing. Resultados: Al comparar, ambos métodos mostraron ser efectivos para la mejora global del cumplimiento de calidad (42,9% el tradicional; p = 0,0083; 75% el de debriefing; p = 0,0002). El grupo de debriefing fue significativamente mejor en los rubros de calidad global (el 56,7 frente al 38,1%; p = 0,009 frente a p = 0,0432) y error de medición (el 88,1 frente al 68,7%, con significancia estadística; p = 0,349). Conclusión: Ambas técnicas de retroalimentación tuvieron un impacto positivo para la mejora del cumplimiento de la calidad en estudios de ultrasonido obstétrico, y la técnica de debriefing mostró ventajas significativas sobre el modelo deenseñanza tradicional en la retroalimentación de las áreas de oportunidad detectadas.(AU)

Introduction: Debriefing is a technique to improve learning outcomes through a process of reflection and feedback. The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of debriefing vs. the traditional teaching model to improve quality compliance in obstetric ultrasound. Subjects and methods: Forty-five recent graduates of ultrasound diploma courses were evaluated during three months of quality control. The physicians were divided into two groups to carry out feedback on areas of opportunity: the control group only received education through the traditional model and the intervention group, which received feedback with debriefing methodology. Results: When compared, both methods were shown to be effective for the overall improvement of quality compliance (42.9% traditional, p = 0.0083, 75% debriefing, p = 0.0002). The debriefing group was significantly better in the areas of overall quality (56.7% vs. 38.1%, p = 0.0090 vs. p = 0.0432), measurement error (88.1% vs. 68.7%, with statistical significance p = 0.349). Conclusion: Both feedback techniques offered positive results for the improvement of quality compliance in obstetric ultrasound studies, with the debriefing technique showing significant advantages over the traditional teaching model in the feedback of detected areas of opportunity.(AU)

Exploring the experiences and perceptions of trainees undertaking a critical incident debrief training programme: A qualitative study.

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Critical incident debriefing is an occupational health tool for supporting healthcare workers following critical incidents. Demand for debriefing has increased following the Covid-19 pandemic. There is now a need for more trained debrief facilitators to meet demand, but there is a dearth of literature regarding how best to train facilitators. This study addressed this by exploring participant experiences of an online critical incident debrief training programme. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 14 individuals who received a 5-day training programme based on the Critical Incident Stress Management model. Participants were recruited from a range of professional disciplines including psychology, nursing and human resources within one British healthcare system. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: The analysis produced three themes. Managing trainee experiences and expectations suggested that disciplinary heterogeneity in training groups supported inter-participant knowledge exchange. However, this variation also meant that training materials did not meet the learning needs of all participants. Modality of training suggested that while online learning was acceptable for some, others experienced screen fatigue and found it hard to build rapport with other participants. Systematic and organisational obstacles to training access and delivery suggested that lack of managerial support and organisational mental health stigma may be barriers to accessing training. CONCLUSION: A 5-day online CISM-based training programme was acceptable to participants. Organisations implementing critical incident debrief training may benefit from (1) offering both in-person and online training options, and (2) tailoring course materials according to the disciplinary make-up of groups.

Impact of video recordings review with structured debriefings on trauma team performance: a prospective observational cohort study.

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of structured debriefings (SD) with audio/video review of trauma patients' resuscitation events on trauma team (TT) technical and non-technical skills. METHODS: Single-center prospective observational cohort study. The study included all emergency department patients aged 18 years or older who received resuscitation from the TT. Virtual meeting was held with the TT using SD to review one trauma patient resuscitation video. Technical skills improvement was based on adherence to the ATLS protocol and non-technical skills based on T-NOTECHS scale. RESULTS: There was statistically significant improvement in adherence to the ATLS protocol: 73% [55-82%] vs 91% [82-100%] (p < 0.001); and improvement in T-NOTECHS scale: 12 [10-14] vs 16 [14-19] points (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this study, we found that structured debriefings with review of patients' resuscitation video recordings can have a significant positive impact on trauma team performance in the emergency department in both technical and non-technical skills.

A comparison of rapid cycle deliberate practice and traditional reflective debriefing on interprofessional team performance.

BACKGROUND: In simulation-based education, debriefing is necessary to promote knowledge acquisition and skill application. Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice (RCDP) and Traditional Reflective Debriefing (TRD) are based in learning theories of deliberate practice and reflective learning, respectively. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of TRD versus RCDP on acquisition of conceptual knowledge and teamwork skills among interdisciplinary learners in the pediatric emergency department. METHODS: One hundred sixty-four learners including emergency department attending physicians, fellows, nurses, medical technicians, paramedics, and respiratory therapists, participated in 28 in-situ simulation workshops over 2 months. Groups were quasi-randomized to receive RCDP or TRD debriefing. Learners completed a multiple-choice test to assess teamwork knowledge. The TEAM Assessment Tool assessed team performance before and after debriefing. Primary outcomes were teamwork knowledge and team performance. RESULTS: Average pre-intervention baseline knowledge assessment scores were high in both groups (TRD mean 90.5 (SD 12.7), RCDP mean 88.7 (SD 15.5). Post-test scores showed small improvements in both groups (TRD mean 93.2 (SD 12.2), RCDP mean 89.9 (SD 13.8), as indicated by effect sizes (ES = 0.21 and 0.09, for TRD and RCDP, respectively). Assessment of team performance demonstrated a significant improvement in mean scores from pre-assessment to post-assessment for all TEAM Assessment skills in both TRD and RCDP arms, based on p-values (all p < 0.01) and effect sizes (all ES > 0.8). While pre-post improvements in TEAM scores were generally higher in the RCDP group based on effect sizes, analysis did not indicate either debriefing approach as meaningfully improved over the other. CONCLUSIONS: Our study did not demonstrate that either TRD versus RCDP was meaningfully better in teamwork knowledge acquisition or improving skill application and performance. As such, we propose Reflective Deliberate Practice as a framework for future study to allow learners to reflect on learning and practice in action.

The effect of scripted debriefing in resuscitation training: A scoping review.

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of scripted debriefing relative to no use of script during debriefing in resuscitation training. Methods: This scoping review was undertaken as part of the continuous evidence evaluation process of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) and based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) extension for scoping review. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and SCOPUS were searched from inception to January 2024. We included all published studies comparing scripted debriefing vs non-scripted debriefing evaluating patient outcomes, behaviour change of learners, learning outcomes for learners and cognitive load and teaching quality for instructors. Results: Our initial literature search identified 1238 citations. After removing 552 duplicates, reviewing the titles and abstracts of the remaining 686 articles yielded 11 for full-text review. Of these, six articles were selected for inclusion in the final analysis. The six studies described debriefing scripts varying in content, framework, scripted language and the integration of objective data. Scripted debriefing improved CPR performance, team leadership skills and knowledge acquisition, but showed no difference in teamwork performance compared to non-scripted debriefing. Scripted debriefing also improved debriefing quality and decreased cognitive load of the instructor during resuscitation training. Conclusion: The use of a debriefing script during resuscitation education can improve CPR performance, team leader performance, knowledge acquisition and reduce the debriefer's cognitive load. Future research should explore how debriefing scripts can be designed to optimize learning outcomes.